Why UV-C?

Rethinking Contamination Control in Cleanrooms

Worker in full protective suit handling materials near packaging machinery in a sterile factory environment.

The Contamination Gap Is Widening

Contamination remains a significant driver of product recalls, compliance events, and operational disruption. While procedural controls have raised the standard protocol, gaps still remain. Additionally, 48% of sterile drug recalls are due to sterility failures, and the cost of one contamination event can reach $1–2M+.

EU GMP Annex 1 raised the bar even higher, mandating a more rigorous and documented strategy across aseptic manufacturing environments. The challenge this creates is one of consistency. Operator dependency and physical limitations introduce variability that is difficult to quantify and harder to defend in an audit. As this challenge continues, the gap between rising standards and what manual cleaning and disinfection processes can deliver continues to widen.

The problem isn't getting smaller

48%

of sterile drug recalls stem from sterility failures
1 Sterility failure data, 2024

70%

of clean room microbial isolates link to personnel
3 Personnel microbial data, 2022
Microscopic view of fungal hyphae and spore structures in black and white.

Learn about the science

When manual cleaning reaches its limits, UV-C fills the gap. UV-C light has been the trusted answer for decades — deployed across high risk environments, water treatment, food processing, and semiconductor manufacturing when the stakes are too high to leave disinfection to chance.

UV-C efficacy is well-documented across a broad spectrum of microorganisms relevant to GMP manufacturing environments. Additionally, when used as an adjunct disinfection technology, UV-C integrates seamlessly into existing protocols.

Why Cleanroom Operators Are Choosing UV-C

Have questions?

Get in touch with a consultant to learn more about UV-C in cleanrooms.